Schools and programs

How to Choose After-School Care and a Place to Be After School — From the "First-Grade Wall" and Research Findings

About 16 min read
Mom of a 5-year-old asks — Her child starts elementary school next year. Both parents work, and she is unsure what to do about a place for after school, and whether to choose public after-school care (gakudō) or private after-school care.

Why this topic is on parents’ minds

From fall to winter of the last year of kindergarten or daycare, alongside preparing for school, worries about “what to do after school” start to rise. For dual-income families, daycare could look after children until 6:00 or 7:00 p.m., but elementary school is not like that.

  • Right after entering school in April, there are days without school lunch when children come home at midday
  • In the first few weeks, first graders go home in groups and have shortened classes, so the after-school time is very long
  • During long breaks such as summer, winter, and spring vacations, children spend the whole day at after-school care
  • If a child cannot get into public after-school care, returning to work or continuing to work itself is shaken
  • Private after-school care typically costs ¥30,000 to ¥70,000 a month, a large impact on the household budget
  • And above all, you wonder whether “every day spent at after-school care” is a happy one for the child

This is the so-called “first-grade wall” (shō-ichi no kabe). Information is divided by region, making the overall picture hard to see, and it is a topic on which each family finds it hard to decide. Here, we organize the facts of the system and findings from education research on after-school programs, to give you material to think about as a family.

First, sorting out the system — the many options for after school

Although we say “after-school care” as one thing, there are actually several systems and forms of operation. To check “what is available in our area,” let’s sort out the whole picture once.

Publicly established and publicly run after-school care (after-school children's clubs)

Public-Public

Established and run by: run directly by the municipality / For: mainly elementary school children in dual-income and single-parent households (the eligible grades differ by municipality) / Cost: generally a few thousand yen to about ¥10,000 a month + snack fees, etc. / Opening hours: weekdays from after school to around 6:00 p.m. (until around 7:00 p.m. with extension) / Activities: basically free play, homework, and snacks / Location: inside elementary schools, children's halls, community centers, etc. / Legal basis: the After-School Children's Healthy Development Program under the Child Welfare Act

Publicly established, privately run, and private after-school care

Public-Private / Private

Established and run by: commissioned by the municipality (NPOs, social welfare corporations, etc.) or run independently by private companies / For: publicly established and privately run has the same requirements as publicly run; private is open to anyone who wants it (no dual-income requirement) / Cost: publicly established and privately run follows public rates; private typically costs ¥30,000 to ¥70,000 a month (more with pickup and dinner options) / Opening hours: private can extend until 8:00 to 10:00 p.m., and some offer full coverage on Saturdays and long breaks / Activities: distinctive programs such as study guidance, English, programming, and sports / Legal basis: the After-School Children's Healthy Development Program, or unlicensed

After-school children's classes and other options

Other Options

After-school children's classes: under the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; community learning and hands-on programs for all children (free to low cost; a place for activities, not childcare) / Family Support Center: paid childcare by local residents arranged by the municipality (by the hour) / Lesson-type after-school care: classes such as swimming or English conversation that run including after-school time / Homes of dual-income friends, grandparents' homes, babysitters: family networks outside the system / Many families build their after-school time by <strong>combining</strong> these

What to keep in mind here is the existence of a policy framework, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology / Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2018)the “New Comprehensive After-School Plan for Children” (formulated in 2018). This is a joint plan of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (now the Children and Families Agency) whose aim is to develop “after-school children’s clubs (gakudō)” and “after-school children’s classes” together and in coordination, providing all children with a safe and secure place to be after school. It set a goal of developing capacity for about 300,000 more children in after-school care by the end of FY2023.

However, this goal varies greatly by region, and Children and Families Agency (2024)the “Implementation Status of After-School Children’s Clubs, 2024” states that against about 1.51 million registered children, about 18,000 children were on waiting lists (children who wanted to use it but could not get in). In cities and areas with growing populations, applications still cannot be met.

What is the difference between public and private after-school care?

Sorting this out clearly makes the options easier to see.

  • Public after-school care (publicly established and publicly run, or publicly established and privately run): as a program under the Child Welfare Act, minimum standards for facilities and operation are set by a Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare ordinance (roughly 1.65 m² or more per child, roughly 40 children or fewer, at least 2 after-school child support workers, etc.). Costs are a few thousand yen to the ¥10,000 range a month, with reductions and exemptions based on income. It is basically a simple place of daily life with “free play, homework, and snacks,” and entry requires meeting conditions such as both parents working, and applying.
  • Private after-school care: run as unlicensed services, many combine distinctive programs such as English, programming, and sports. They respond flexibly to how dual-income families work, with pickup services, dinner, and extensions until 10:00 p.m., but costs of about ¥30,000 to ¥70,000 a month are typical. There is no dual-income requirement, and in principle anyone who wants to can apply.

“Which is better, public or private after-school care?” cannot be decided uniformly. The best answer changes depending on how your family works, your financial situation, your child’s temperament, and local supply.

What does the research say?

Here is the other core of this article. “Is spending time at after-school care good for children?” “Does it mean anything just to leave them there?”—on questions like these, the world of after-school program research has produced fairly settled findings.

Question 1: Are after-school programs good for children’s development?

One of the most cited studies of after-school programs in the world is the meta-analysis by Durlak and colleagues.

Durlak and colleagues at Loyola University (2010)

A meta-analysis (in the American Journal of Community Psychology) that integrated 75 studies (about 68,000 children from kindergarten through high school) on the effects of after-school programs on children’s social and emotional skills, self-perception, academic achievement, and behavior

reports the following results on the overall effects of after-school programs.

  • Children who took part showed significant improvement in each area of self-perception, bonding to school, positive social behavior, and academic achievement (effect sizes d=0.14 to 0.34, all p<0.05)
  • Positive effects were also confirmed for reducing problem behavior and drug use
  • However, effects were confirmed only for programs that met the “SAFE criteria”

The “SAFE criteria” here are four requirements for high-quality programs proposed by Durlak and colleagues.

  • S = Sequenced: activities organized in order, step by step
  • A = Active: a way of learning in which children participate actively
  • F = Focused: focused on developing particular skills
  • E = Explicit: the skills to be developed are made explicit

Put the other way, in programs that did not meet these requirements—programs that “just gather children and have them pass the time”—no effect on developmental outcomes was confirmed. This has a very important implication for choosing after-school care.

Question 2: How does the way children spend after school affect their development?

Another frequently referenced work is a review of organized after-school activities by Mahoney and colleagues at the University of Michigan.

Mahoney, Harris, and Eccles (2006)

A review paper (in the Society for Research in Child Development’s Social Policy Report) that organized, centering on U.S. longitudinal studies, the effects of participation in organized activities such as after-school care, sports clubs, and arts activities on the development of children and adolescents

points out the following.

  • Participation in organized after-school activities was consistently associated with better academic achievement, bonding to school, and more prosocial behavior
  • On the other hand, regarding the “over-scheduling hypothesis” that was a topic at the time—the concern that children are worn out by too many lessons and activities—looking at the reality of the average American child (under 5 hours a week), “over-scheduled children” were actually a minority, and the association between activity participation and psychological health was generally in a positive direction
  • However, excessive cramming that squeezes family time and time for free play and rest can clearly be negative

In other words, the rough summary of research is that both extremes are undesirable: spending long hours after school “with no structure” and “filling it completely with plans.” Several studies suggest that “moderately structured activities that the child enjoys” are what best support children’s development.

Question 3: What determines the quality of after-school care?

Integrating Durlak and colleagues’ work and later research from the U.K. and the Nordic countries, the following are repeatedly named as elements that support the quality of after-school programs.

  • The ratio of adults to children: the fewer children per support worker, the more individual engagement is possible
  • The expertise and continuity of support workers: whether qualified adults can keep looking after the same children for a long time
  • The balance between structured activities and freedom: not managing everything, and respecting time when children spend time on their own initiative
  • Operation that cares for relationships among children: a system that can intervene early in bullying and trouble
  • Coordination with families: daily communication that carefully tells parents how their child is doing

These are indicators of quality that show up in “the substance of how the facility is run,” whether it is public or private after-school care. The points to look at when visiting gather here.

High-quality after-school programs vs. programs that 'just look after' children — effects on developmental outcomes
Effect sizes (d values) from the Durlak et al. (2010) meta-analysis, programs meeting the SAFE criteria only
Academic achievement
Meets SAFE criteria
d=0.20
Positive social behavior
Meets SAFE criteria
d=0.24
Self-perception and self-esteem
Meets SAFE criteria
d=0.34
Reduction in problem behavior
Meets SAFE criteria
d=0.19
Programs not meeting SAFE criteria
No effect confirmed
About 0

From the meta-analysis by Durlak, Weissberg, & Pachan (2010). In after-school programs meeting the SAFE criteria (sequenced, active, focused, with the skills to be developed made explicit), significant improvements in academics, social skills, and self-perception (d=0.14 to 0.34) were confirmed, while in programs that did not meet these requirements and 'just gather children and have them pass the time,' almost no effect on developmental outcomes was confirmed.

Source: Summarized by the editorial team from Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M. (2010). American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3-4), 294-309

Mom of a 5-year-old

My son starts elementary school next year. Both of us work, so after-school care is a must, but the public after-school care in our area seems to be right at capacity, and I’m anxious about what will happen with my job if he can’t get in…

Nei-sensei

That’s the “first-grade wall,” isn’t it? Many families run into it at this point in the last year of kindergarten or daycare. The Children and Families Agency’s 2024 implementation survey says there are about 18,000 children on waiting lists nationwide, and the hurdle for entry is especially high in cities. First, I recommend checking early on your municipality’s application schedule and the criteria for priority.

Mom of a 5-year-old

I’m also considering private after-school care, but it’s about ¥60,000 a month, and thinking of that continuing for 6 years scares me financially.

Nei-sensei

It’s true that private after-school care is a big financial burden. But many families use private care only in the lower grades, and by 3rd or 4th grade the child can stay home alone. If you don’t assume “all 6 years” and instead plan around “how to get through the first few years,” the options widen a little.

Mom of a 5-year-old

What also worries me is summer vacation. Isn’t spending all day at after-school care hard on a child…?

Nei-sensei

That worry is natural. Durlak and colleagues’ large meta-analysis (2010) shows that high-quality after-school programs have positive effects on children’s social skills, self-perception, and academics, but it also found that effects are hard to see in programs that “just look after” children. So when you visit, be sure to ask how long breaks are spent—outdoor activities, homework support, snacks, free play time, and so on. If it’s a place where your child feels “it’s fun,” summer vacation can also become valuable learning time.

Breaking down the “first-grade wall”

The “first-grade wall” tends to be talked about vaguely, but in reality it is a collection of several walls. Breaking it down makes it easier to plan responses.

Wall 1: Shortened classes and the period without school lunch right after entry

At many elementary schools, for 1 to 2 weeks after entry in April, there are days without school lunch, when children come home at midday. Many public after-school care programs open from the morning during this period, but children need to bring a lunch box. Many families adjust the timing of returning to work to match this “start of school lunch.”

Wall 2: The shortened-class period for first graders

For a while after entry, first graders go home in groups and have shortened classes, with days of only up to 5th period. Public after-school care responds to this, but in some areas a “gap” arises between the time school starts in the morning and the time after-school care opens, and how to fill it can become an issue.

Wall 3: Summer, winter, and spring vacations

Summer vacation in particular is about 40 days, spent all day at after-school care. Public after-school care generally opens from around 8:00 a.m. with children bringing a lunch box, while private after-school care often offers long hours with pickup and dinner. The quality of how summer vacation is spent is a point to pay special attention to when choosing after-school care.

Wall 4: The gap between after-school care closing time and commuting time

Most public after-school care is until 6:00 p.m., or around 7:00 p.m. with extension. Considering full-time work plus commuting, many families cannot make pickup on time. Many get through it with a combination of private after-school care (until 8:00 to 10:00 p.m.), Family Support, babysitters, and help from grandparents.

Wall 5: The possibility of not getting into after-school care

This is the waiting-list problem mentioned at the beginning. In some areas, children may not get in even when both parents work full-time. Check with your municipality, by fall of the last year of kindergarten or daycare, about the timing of applications, required documents, and how priority works.

Checkpoints for visiting to see the quality of after-school care

Whether public or private, checking the following when you visit makes it easier to see how a program is actually run.

  • The number and qualifications of staff (after-school child support workers): the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare ordinance requires at least 2 support workers for a group of roughly 40 children. When visiting, check how many adults there are relative to the number of children
  • The adults’ expressions and communication: the atmosphere between support workers and children, and among support workers, says a lot about the quality of operation
  • How children spend their time: whether everyone does the same thing, or whether there is time when children can choose how to spend it themselves
  • Homework support: whether there is homework time, and whether children can get help when they don’t understand
  • Snacks: homemade, store-bought, allergy-friendly, etc.
  • Outdoor activities and time to move the body: whether chances to exercise are secured, such as the schoolyard, parks, or indoor exercise
  • Handling bullying and trouble: how they intervene in trouble between children, and how they contact parents
  • Operation during long breaks: how a day in summer vacation is spent, and whether there are special programs
  • Communication with families: how they tell you about your child’s day—contact notebook, in person, app, etc.
  • Options such as pickup and extensions: for private care, how well it fits how your family works

These are a checklist for seeing “the substance of operation,” rather than how the facility looks. If possible, visiting during after-school hours on a weekday shows you the reality best.

Timing of applications

It differs by area, but here is a rough guide.

  • Spring to summer of the last year of kindergarten or daycare: research the after-school care options in your area, and check your municipality’s entry requirements
  • Fall of the last year (September to October): the time when visits and applications for public after-school care start. Visits to private after-school care also start around this time
  • Winter of the last year (November to February): application deadlines, notification of selection results
  • Spring of the last year (March): entry decided, orientation, preparing necessary belongings
  • April of 1st grade: entering school and after-school care, adjusting around the timing of shortened classes and the start of school lunch

Public after-school care has a limited application period, and in some areas, if you miss it, you have to wait until the next fiscal year. Gathering information early gives peace of mind.

Balancing with family life: realistic combinations

Many families run after-school time not with a single system, but by combining several systems.

  • Public after-school care on weekdays, plus private after-school care only during summer vacation
  • Private after-school care on weekdays, with help from grandparents on Saturdays and long breaks
  • Public after-school care (until 6:00 p.m.) + pickup by a babysitter 2 days a week
  • Public after-school care + lessons 1 to 2 days a week (swimming, English conversation, etc.)
  • Public after-school care + Family Support to cover after 7:00 p.m.

Aiming for “everything covered perfectly by one system” narrows your options. The realistic approach is to break it down in detail—“what covers this time slot on weekdays”—and put it together to fit your family’s situation and your child’s stamina and personality.

Know the range of monthly fees for private after-school care

Let’s get a rough sense of the costs of private after-school care (they vary greatly by area and service content).

  • Standard use (weekdays, 5 days a week, after school to 7:00 p.m.): about ¥30,000 to ¥50,000 a month
  • With pickup, dinner, and extension until 10:00 p.m.: about ¥50,000 to ¥70,000 a month
  • Types with rich distinctive programs such as English and programming: about ¥60,000 to ¥100,000 a month
  • Coverage for long breaks such as summer and winter vacations: added separately (examples of about ¥50,000 to ¥100,000 for summer vacation)

In contrast, public after-school care is often ¥5,000 to the ¥10,000 range a month, and some municipalities have reductions and exemptions based on income. The difference in cost can be ¥300,000 to ¥600,000 a year, and ¥2,000,000 to ¥4,000,000 over 6 years. It is a point to consider in your household’s long-term planning: how much can you afford?

Closing dialogue

Mom of a 5-year-old

Listening to you, I feel a little lighter knowing it doesn’t have to be an either-or of “public or private.”

Nei-sensei

That’s right. The best combination differs depending on how your family works, your child’s temperament, and local circumstances. Rather than aiming for “covering everything perfectly with one,” it’s realistic to break it down and put it together: “this for this time slot on weekdays, this for long breaks.”

Mom of a 5-year-old

When I visited a private after-school program, the English and programming curriculum was really rich, and it felt very attractive. But after hearing you, I see that looking at “the substance of operation” matters more than “how impressive the distinctive programs are.”

Nei-sensei

Yes, that’s exactly what Durlak and colleagues’ research shows. What works for children’s development is not “the type of impressive program” but the quality of operation: “sequenced, with children able to participate actively, and with the skills to be developed made explicit.” That shows up less in the content of distinctive programs and more in the number and expertise of support workers, how they engage with children, and coordination with families. When you visit, please look at that with your own eyes.

Mom of a 5-year-old

My son is shy with strangers and isn’t great with large groups. I’m worried he’ll get too tired at after-school care…

Nei-sensei

Paying attention to your child’s temperament is the most important thing of all. Depending on temperament, a small program may suit better than a large after-school care program with many children. Please choose not by “because everyone in the class goes” but by “whether it suits my child.” For the first few weeks, watch carefully your child’s expressions, how he is after coming home, and his sleep at night. If there are clear signs that he is worn out, it’s perfectly fine to switch to a different combination.

Mom of a 5-year-old

Hearing “it’s OK to change partway” makes me feel a bit relieved.

Nei-sensei

Truly, it is. The first choice doesn’t decide everything. Your child will grow into 2nd and 3rd grade, and how your family works will change too. If you think of “after-school care as your child’s after-school home” and regularly review whether it is a fitting place for your child to come back to, saying “I’m home,” you’ll be fine. Research doesn’t tell us “this is the right answer,” but it gives plenty of encouragement that “it’s OK to adjust while watching your child.”

Mom of a 5-year-old

Somehow I feel the pressure lifting a bit. Next week, I’ll go visit the public after-school care in our area and a private program.

Nei-sensei

Please do. If you look with the checkpoints we talked about today in mind—the number of support workers, the children’s expressions, time to spend freely, operation during long breaks—you’ll see the “substance” of each facility. Please choose with the viewpoint of whether it is a place where your child can feel safe as their “after-school home.”

Research details

Primary sources
StrongDurlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., & Pachan, M.2010American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3-4), 294-309

Study design: A meta-analysis integrating 75 studies (including comparisons with control groups) on the effects of after-school programs on children’s personal and social skills

Participants: More than 68,000 children from kindergarten through high school in total

Main results: • In after-school programs meeting the SAFE criteria (Sequenced, Active, Focused, Explicit), significant improvements were confirmed in participating children (p<0.05) • Self-perception and self-esteem: effect size d=0.34 • Positive social behavior: d=0.24 • Academic achievement: d=0.20 • Reduction in problem behavior: d=0.19 • In programs that did not meet the SAFE criteria and “just gathered children,” these effects were almost not confirmed

Limitations: A meta-analysis centered mainly on U.S. studies. When applying it directly to Japan’s after-school care system, differences in cultural and institutional context need to be kept in mind. The effect sizes themselves are moderate, and expecting large changes from an after-school program alone is an excessive expectation.

StrongMahoney, J. L., Harris, A. L., & Eccles, J. S.2006Social Policy Report, 20(4), 1-31

Study design: A review paper that organized, centering on U.S. longitudinal and cross-sectional studies, the association between participation in organized after-school activities (after-school care, sports, arts activities, etc.) and the developmental outcomes of children and adolescents

Main results: • Participation in organized after-school activities was consistently associated with better academic achievement, bonding to school, and more prosocial behavior • Regarding the “over-scheduling hypothesis,” looking at the average activity time of U.S. children (under 5 hours a week), “over-scheduled children” were a minority, and the association between activity participation and psychological health was generally in a positive direction • However, excessive cramming that squeezes family time, free play, and rest can clearly be negative for children

Limitations: A review based on the U.S. context, which differs from the reality of Japanese children’s after-school time (in Japan, the share of lessons is high, and total time in after-school activities tends to be greater). Applying it to individual families requires judgment while watching how the child is doing.

StrongMinistry of Health, Labour and Welfare2014Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ordinance No. 63 (promulgated April 30, 2014)

Official document: A ministerial ordinance, based on Article 34-8-2 of the Child Welfare Act, setting the standards for facilities and operation that municipalities must follow when running After-School Children’s Healthy Development Programs

Main content: • Area of the dedicated space: roughly 1.65 m² or more per child • One unit of support: roughly 40 children or fewer • Staffing of after-school child support workers: at least 2 per unit (1 of whom may be replaced by an assistant) • Support workers must have completed training conducted by the prefectural governor (the after-school child support worker certification training) • Days open: in principle, at least 250 days a year • Opening hours: in principle, at least 3 hours a day on weekdays, and at least 8 hours a day on school holidays

Significance: A national ordinance setting the minimum standards for public after-school care (after-school children’s clubs). It is the most reliable source for the standard values when checking “the number of support workers, the area, and group size” during a visit.

StrongMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology / Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare2018新・放課後子ども総合プラン [New Comprehensive After-School Plan for Children] (formulated September 14, 2018)

Official document: A national-level policy plan for after-school measures, formulated jointly by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (now the Children and Families Agency)

Main content: • Develop capacity for about 300,000 more children in after-school care (after-school children’s clubs) by the end of FY2023 • Implement after-school children’s clubs and after-school children’s classes together and in coordination • Aim for implementation of both programs together or in coordination in every elementary school district (about 20,000 locations) • Improve the quality of children’s activities with the participation of local residents and others

Significance: A policy document showing the basic direction of after-school measures in Japan. An important source for understanding the institutional positioning of “after-school care” and “after-school children’s classes.”

StrongChildren and Families Agency2024令和6年 放課後児童健全育成事業(放課後児童クラブ)の実施状況 [Implementation Status of After-School Children's Healthy Development Programs (After-School Children's Clubs), 2024]

Official document and public statistics: A nationwide survey of the implementation status of after-school children’s clubs that the Children and Families Agency conducts every year as of May 1

Main content: • Number of registered children: about 1.51 million (about 25% of elementary school children nationwide) • Number of children on waiting lists (children who wanted to use it but could not): about 18,000 • Number of clubs: about 26,000 • Number of support units: about 37,000 • Most children on waiting lists are concentrated in the lower grades, 1st to 3rd grade • Regional differences are large, with waiting lists tending to be longer in cities and areas with growing populations

Significance: The most basic and up-to-date public statistics for understanding the supply of after-school care in Japan. It backs up the fact that “a child may not be able to get into public after-school care.”