What Is Montessori Education? — 100 Years of History, and What Research Has Shown
Why this topic is on parents’ minds
“Montessori education”—you’ve heard the words, there is a kindergarten like that nearby, and famous people (such as Google’s founders and former President Obama) sometimes come up as alumni. But:
- How is it different from an ordinary kindergarten?
- The monthly fee seems high—are there effects to match?
- I hear they “let children do as they like”—will my child be OK with that?
When choosing a kindergarten is right in front of you, questions like these never end. Because the method has continued for more than 100 years, information overflows when you look into it, and you can’t tell what to believe.
The origins and ideas of Montessori education
Montessori education was systematized by Maria Montessori (1870-1952), an Italian woman physician.
- 1870
Maria Montessori is born in Italy
Unusually for a woman of her time, she entered medicine. She studied medicine at the University of Rome and became one of the pioneering women physicians.
- 1907
She opens the Casa dei Bambini (Children's House)
In San Lorenzo, a poor district of Rome, she opened a facility for children ages 3 to 6 from families where both parents worked. Her observation and practice here became the starting point of Montessori education.
- 1909
She publishes 'The Scientific Pedagogy as Applied to Child Education in the Children's Houses'
Her first work systematizing the educational method. It was translated in countries across Europe and spread internationally.
- 1929
She founds the Association Montessori Internationale (AMI)
Founded as an international organization for teacher training and quality control. It still connects accredited schools in countries around the world.
- Today
About 20,000 schools operate around the world
In Japan too, there are several hundred kindergartens and schools. There are also public efforts (in the United States, public Montessori schools are also increasing).
What matters here is the fact that Montessori education was originally a method developed for children in a poor district. Its starting point is completely different from the image some people have today of “high-end education for wealthy families.”
The ideas Montessori education values
As a physician, Maria Montessori started from “observing” children. The central ideas drawn from that are the following.
- Children have the power to learn by themselves — adults do not “drill knowledge in,” but arrange the environment and support children in learning by themselves
- There are “sensitive periods” — there are periods when particular abilities, such as language, movement, the senses, and order, grow easily (different by age)
- Respecting children’s initiative — children themselves choose what to do
- A prepared environment — so that children can work on things by themselves, materials and furniture are all child-sized and arranged accordingly
What is practiced — what goes on in a Montessori classroom
If you look inside an actual Montessori classroom, you see quite a different scene from an ordinary kindergarten.
1. Mixed-age classes
Children ages 3 to 6 spend time in the same class (elementary classes are ages 6 to 9 and 9 to 12). Younger children learn from older ones, and older children deepen their understanding by teaching.
2. “Work time”
Every day, for 2 to 3 hours, children use materials to work on activities they have chosen themselves (called “work” in Montessori). A feature is the long time spent concentrating on something alone.
3. Materials in 5 areas
Montessori materials are divided broadly into 5 areas.
- Practical life — activities related to daily life itself, such as pouring, cutting, washing, tying, and polishing
- Sensorial education — special materials that refine sight, touch, and hearing (the Pink Tower, the knobbed cylinders, etc.)
- Language education — sandpaper letters, picture cards, etc.
- Mathematics education — number rods, beads, decimal-system materials
- Cultural education — geography, history, biology, the arts, etc.
4. The teacher as a “guide”
The teacher does not “teach,” but takes the role of a “guide” who observes children’s activities and introduces materials as needed. There is almost no lecture-style instruction, and scenes where the teacher stands at the front and explains to everyone at once are few.
What does the research say? Two views
On the effects of Montessori education, there are both studies showing “it is effective” and studies pointing out that “the research methods themselves have problems.” Let’s look at both side by side.
Study A: Montessori education has positive effects in several areas
A long-term follow-up study conducted at 2 public Montessori magnet schools in the United States, using an admission-by-lottery system (only children chosen by lottery are admitted)
is known among Montessori studies as especially rigorous. That is because admission is decided by lottery, which greatly reduces “self-selection bias” due to the home environment or parents’ attitudes.
In this study, children who entered the schools from age 3 and children who lost the lottery and attended other kindergartens were followed for 4 years. As a result, the Montessori children showed higher scores in academics, social skills, executive function (the ability to plan and to exercise self-control), and more. As a further important finding, it was found that the gap in academic achievement due to family income had narrowed greatly in the Montessori group.
In a meta-analysis integrating 33 studies published from 1991 to 2021 (about 21,679 children), children who received Montessori education, compared with children who received other educational approaches, showed positive effects in all 5 areas.
The effect size (g) is a standardized measure of the difference between groups. 0.2 is considered 'small,' 0.5 'moderate,' and 0.8 or more 'large.' The g=1.10 for academic achievement is a strikingly large effect among the 5 areas.
Source: Demangeon et al. (2023) Contemporary Educational Psychology
It is important that the method of a large-scale meta-analysis showed that the effect on academic achievement (reading, writing, math, etc.) is especially notable.
Study B: However, care is needed with the research methods
On the other hand, there are also critical points made about the research methods of Montessori education themselves.
A review paper on Montessori education research published in npj Science of Learning, a journal of the Nature group
lays out problems like the following.
- There are almost no rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) — many studies take the approach of matching “Montessori children” and “comparison children” on variables such as home environment, but cannot fully rule out the possibility that invisible factors (such as parents’ views on education) affect the results
- Samples are small, and regions are skewed — many studies are on the scale of dozens to hundreds of children, which limits generalizing the results
- The content of “Montessori” varies widely — even among schools calling themselves “Montessori,” there are large differences in materials and how thoroughly teachers are trained, so the effects shown in research will not necessarily be reproduced at every Montessori kindergarten
In other words, what this body of research shows is that research to rigorously prove “whether Montessori education is effective” has not yet been done sufficiently.
How to read the two studies
A and B are not in conflict; they can be said to look at the same question from different angles.
- A: Looking at the body of research as a whole, positive effects are reported in several areas
- B: However, each study has methodological weaknesses, and one cannot say “the same effect can be expected from every ‘Montessori’”
Taking both into account, it can be summarized like this: “At a kindergarten that genuinely practices Montessori education, positive effects on children’s cognitive, social, and academic development can be expected,” but “judging by the name ‘Montessori’ alone is risky.”
There’s a Montessori kindergarten nearby, but the monthly fee is about twice that of an ordinary kindergarten… I wonder whether it’s worth that much.
That’s a natural concern. The effects confirmed in research are for children who spent a certain period at kindergartens that genuinely practice Montessori education. If your child enters at 3 or 4 and attends until graduation, she’ll receive it fully during the ages when effects tend to appear.
Can you tell whether it’s genuine?
One guide is whether the teachers hold an international Montessori qualification (AMI or AMS certification). Beyond that, it’s reassuring if you can visit the classroom and check whether the children are choosing materials themselves and concentrating on them, whether classes are mixed-age, and whether the materials are genuine.
I see. So you can’t judge by the name “Montessori” alone.
That’s right. Even under the same name, “Montessori,” the content actually differs quite a lot. What research has seen effects from is that “genuine content.”
Children this method tends to suit, and children it may not
From research and accumulated practice, these tendencies are said to exist. However, they are not absolute; please read them only as a guide.
Children it often suits
- Children who like to concentrate at their own pace — time to become absorbed in one activity is valued in Montessori
- Children who like using their hands — the materials are mainly things to touch and manipulate by hand
- Children with a strong “I want to do it myself” — there are many scenes where adults watch over without stepping in
Children who may need some consideration
- Children who like moving in rhythm as a group, or like set structures — Montessori centers on individual activities, with little whole-group instruction
- Children who need long periods to release energy — because the quiet concentration time is long, it is good to secure chances to move the body elsewhere
- Children who love playing with many others and find activities alone hard — they may need to get used to it little by little
However, these do not mean “it doesn’t suit them,” but that “getting used to it may be needed at first.” Actual Montessori kindergartens have ways of helping children settle naturally into the environment.
Closing dialogue
In the end, how should I think about whether to send my child to a Montessori kindergarten?
First, I recommend going to visit. The best thing is to see how your child reacts to the atmosphere of the classroom and whether she shows interest in the activities. Research figures speak about “averages,” so in the end, fit with your child is what matters.
If we don’t send her, are there things we can do at home?
Some of the Montessori ideas can be brought in at home too. For example, “arranging a child-sized environment” (setting out a step stool so she can reach the washbasin, putting clothes on a low shelf so she can choose them herself), “taking the time to wait when she wants to do it herself,” and “doing everyday housework together” (washing vegetables, folding laundry). These alone become a foundation for nurturing your child’s sense of “I can do it myself.”
So even without sending her to that kindergarten, there are things we can do. I feel a little relieved.
Research details
Primary sourcesStudy design: A long-term follow-up study using admission by lottery (a natural experiment)
Participants: 141 3-year-olds who applied to 2 public Montessori magnet schools in the United States (70 in the Montessori group / 71 in the comparison group)
Follow-up period: From age 3 to age 6 (3 years of preschool)
Main results: The Montessori group showed significantly higher scores in academic achievement (reading, writing, math), executive function, social problem solving, and theory of mind (p<0.05 to p<0.001). Furthermore, the achievement gap due to family income had narrowed greatly in the Montessori group.
Limitations: It is a “natural experiment” using a system in which admission is decided by lottery, not a pure randomized trial. The results are from a limited setting of 2 schools.
Study design: Systematic review + meta-analysis
Scope: 33 experimental / quasi-experimental studies published from 1991 to 2021 (21,679 children, 268 effect sizes), conducted in North America, Asia, and Europe
Main results: Positive effects in all 5 areas. Cognitive abilities g=0.17, social skills g=0.22, creativity g=0.25, motor skills g=0.27, academic achievement g=1.10. The effect on academic achievement is especially large.
Limitations: The quality of the included studies varies. The definition of “Montessori” and implementation fidelity differ from study to study. There is a possibility of publication bias (positive results being more likely to be published).
Study design: A matched comparison of a Montessori group and a comparison group
Participants: 112 children, 5-year-olds and 12-year-olds combined, at a public Montessori school in Milwaukee
Main results: Among 5-year-olds, the Montessori group scored significantly higher in letter recognition, executive function, and social problem solving. Among 12-year-olds, there were significant differences in creative writing and social skills. Both groups were equal in academic achievement on standard tests.
Limitations: The influence of parents’ attitudes on admission to a public Montessori school (self-selection bias) may remain.
Study design: A systematic review of Montessori research
Scope: An integrated review of the major existing Montessori studies
Main results: Many Montessori studies show positive results in cognitive and academic areas, but there are almost no rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Many studies rely on matching methods, and problems of selection bias, sample size, and implementation fidelity are pointed out. Rigorously proving “whether Montessori education is effective” requires more methodologically robust research.
Limitations: Because it is a review paper, it does not provide new empirical data.