Method explained

What Is Steiner Education (Waldorf Education)? — 100 Years of History, and What Research Has Shown

About 19 min read
Mom of a 4-year-old girl asks — She is interested in a Steiner kindergarten (Waldorf type) in her neighborhood.

Why this topic is on parents’ minds

“Steiner education”—you’ve heard the name, there is a kindergarten like that nearby, rainbow-colored silks and wooden toys, knitted wool dolls, beautiful chalkboard drawings… you can sense that it has a distinctive worldview. But:

  • How is it different from an ordinary kindergarten?
  • What is “anthroposophy”? It sounds like mysticism, which bothers me a little…
  • Is it true that they don’t use screens? We already let our child watch NHK E-Tele
  • I hear they don’t teach letters and numbers early—won’t my child fall behind?

When choosing a kindergarten is right in front of you, questions like these never end. Because the method has continued for more than 100 years, information overflows when you look into it, and you can’t tell what to believe.

The origins and ideas of Steiner education

Steiner education was systematized by Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925), an Austrian-born philosopher and thinker.

  1. 1861

    Rudolf Steiner is born in Austria (now part of Croatia)

    While young, he was involved in editing Goethe's writings on natural science, and moved on to research in philosophy and mystical thought.

  2. 1900s

    He systematizes anthroposophy

    Leaving the Theosophical movement, he proposed 'anthroposophy,' his own exploration of the relationship between humans and the spiritual world. It developed into many fields of practice, including education, medicine, agriculture (biodynamic), and the arts (eurythmy).

  3. 1919

    The first Waldorf school opens in Stuttgart

    At the request of Emil Molt, head of the Waldorf-Astoria cigarette factory, a school for the children of factory workers opened (September 7, with 256 children). This is the origin of the name 'Waldorf education.'

  4. 1925

    Steiner dies

    He died at age 64. The students and teachers he left behind spread the educational approach around the world.

  5. 1968

    The Association of Waldorf Schools of North America (AWSNA) is founded

    A dozen or so schools in North America came together to launch an organization for sharing teacher training and maintaining quality.

  6. Today

    About 900 schools operate in 83 countries around the world

    In Japan too, there are several dozen Steiner early childhood facilities and schools (such as member schools of the NPO Japan Association of Steiner Schools).

What matters here is the fact that Steiner education, too, was originally developed as a method for the children of factory workers. Its starting point is completely different from the image some people have today of “high-end education for wealthy families.”

About anthroposophy — a neutral introduction

Something you cannot avoid in understanding Steiner education is the worldview behind it, anthroposophy. This is a body of thought systematized by Rudolf Steiner himself, and it includes a distinctive view of human beings, such as “humans have three aspects—body, soul, and spirit—each of which develops over time” and “there are major turning points in children’s development in 7-year cycles (ages 0-7: will, 7-14: feeling, 14-21: thinking).”

Anthroposophy also includes elements of mystical thought such as reincarnation, karma, and the spiritual world, and some people take it as a religious or spiritual worldview, while others keep their distance.

What matters here is that at the level of practice, families do not necessarily need to believe in anthroposophy. Many Steiner kindergartens and schools in Japan do not put anthroposophy up front or require it of parents, and adopt it as a methodology of educational practice. On the other hand, teachers learn the anthroposophical view of human beings in internal training, and that worldview is the basis for daily practice (such as “until age 7, develop the body and senses rather than giving intellectual stimulation”).

How to take the anthroposophical worldview is, in the end, each parent’s own judgment. The reality is that while some people feel “it’s mystical thought, so I can’t accept it,” others feel “I can relate to it as a viewpoint that sees humans from many sides.”

The ideas Steiner education values

Even setting the anthroposophical background aside, the central ideas that are consistent at the level of practice are the following.

  • Development has stages, and there is learning suited to each stage — until age 7, “body and senses”; ages 7-14, “feeling and imagination”; age 14 and up, “thinking” are central
  • Not rushing early teaching of letters and numbers — until about ages 6-7, pretend play, experiences in nature, and artistic activities are placed at the center
  • A rhythmic day, week, and year — the same activity at the same time every day, the same handwork on the same day every week, and a year that turns with seasonal festivals
  • Emphasis on artistic expression — painting (wet-on-wet watercolor), music, eurythmy (an art of movement), and handwork (knitting, sewing) are built into daily life
  • Limiting screens and ready-made toys — TV, tablets, and character goods are avoided in principle, and simple materials that stimulate the imagination are used, such as silk cloths, wooden blocks, and wool dolls

What is practiced — what goes on at a Steiner kindergarten

If you look inside an actual Steiner kindergarten, you see quite a different scene from an ordinary kindergarten.

1. Mixed-age classes

Children ages 3 to 6 spend time in the same class. Younger children learn from older ones, and older children draw out their own strengths by caring for younger ones. This is an idea shared with Montessori.

2. A rhythmic day

Every day proceeds in the same flow at the same times. For example, morning circle (songs and ring games), free play, snack, outdoor play, lunch, story time… The idea is that “the same things happening at the same time” gives children a sense of security.

3. Seasonal festivals and the rhythm of the year

Sowing seeds in spring, the midsummer festival, the harvest festival, the lantern festival (St. Martin’s), Advent and the winter solstice festival… The year is colored by festivals, and children experience the changing seasons with all five senses.

4. Simple materials and “unfinished” toys

Silk cloths, pieces of wood, pinecones, dolls made of wool (with no faces drawn on). The basic idea is that precisely because they are “unfinished,” they can become anything through the child’s imagination. Plastic character goods and battery-operated toys are not placed in the room.

5. A policy of limiting screens

Steiner kindergartens and schools strongly recommend to parents that children not use TV, tablets, or smartphones, especially until age 7. A distinctive feature is that parents are often told clearly at entry that the school would like screens limited at home too.

6. The teacher as “a mother-like presence”

Kindergarten teachers do not “teach” knowledge; instead, they slowly do housework and handwork in front of the children, and the children grow by imitating it. Time is built into the classroom for the teacher to bake bread, spin wool, or mend things.

What does the research say? Two views

On the effects of Steiner education, there are both “studies with positive findings in particular areas” and “studies finding academics to be average or somewhat modest.” Furthermore, as a premise, we will also tell you honestly about the current situation that the body of research itself is considerably thinner than for Montessori.

Study A: Positive findings in motivation to learn, the arts, and social-emotional aspects

a research group centered at the University of British Columbia (2021)

A study using the Austrian PISA 2015 sample (7,007 15-year-olds, including 149 Waldorf students) and a method called “propensity score matching,” which statistically balances socioeconomic backgrounds

is among the studies of Steiner education with a relatively large sample and solid methodology.

In this study, Waldorf students, compared with students at ordinary schools with matched family socioeconomic backgrounds, showed significantly higher scores in enjoyment of learning science and interest in science. On the other hand, science test scores themselves were almost the same as (slightly lower than) ordinary schools. The researchers interpret this result as “Waldorf education’s inquiry-centered science education (IBSE) works on motivation to learn rather than on acquiring knowledge.”

a comparison study of public Waldorf charter schools in California, U.S. (2024)

A recent study comparing 16 Waldorf-type charter schools in California, other charter schools, and local public schools using the state’s standardized achievement test (CAASPP)

found that Waldorf charter schools’ English and math test scores showed results that differed by area and grade compared with other charter schools. While they were lower than other charters in some areas, compared with local public schools under the same socioeconomic conditions, results equal to or higher in several areas were also reported.

In addition, as a secondary finding, it was reported that Waldorf charter schools have relatively high proportions of English language learners (ELL) and children from economically disadvantaged families, accepting children from more diverse backgrounds.

Study B: A tendency to be “average, or slower to develop” in academics

U.S. researchers Larrison and colleagues (2012)

A study that analyzed 20 years of standardized achievement test data and parent comments for public Waldorf charter schools in the United States

found an interesting pattern.

  • Lower grades (2nd to 3rd grade): significantly lower scores than the local public school average in both reading and math
  • Middle to upper grades (6th to 8th grade): significantly above the local public school average, especially in reading

In other words, the researchers’ interpretation is that children who received Steiner education showed a pattern of developing slowly at first and catching up later. This result also matched the philosophy of Steiner education (“don’t rush intellectual stimulation until age 7; the abilities needed later grow from within”).

However, this study compared publicly available standardized test data and has the limitation that family backgrounds and abilities at entry are not fully matched. “Low at first but improving later” does appear in the data, but this study alone cannot say for sure whether it is really thanks to Steiner education.

Study C: The fact that there is little research in the first place

What Marshall of UCL (2017)an essay that, within a review paper on Montessori research, also touches on the state of research on alternative education methods in general points out is that even for Montessori, rigorous RCTs (randomized controlled trials) are still few. The body of research on Steiner education is even thinner than that, as things stand.

Several reasons can be considered. (1) Steiner schools are a minority worldwide. (2) Because entry requires a strong decision by parents, randomization is difficult. (3) Because Waldorf itself does not take “measurable academic achievement” as its main goal and emphasizes the arts and character formation, it does not fit well with quantitative research to begin with.

In other words, when talking about “the effects of Steiner education,” you need to start from the point that there is little material to talk about in the first place.

How to read the three studies

A, B, and C are not in conflict; they can be said to look at the same question from different angles.

  • A: Positive findings in “hard-to-quantify” aspects such as motivation to learn, interest in science, and artistic expression
  • B: In academic test scores, modest in the lower grades, with a tendency to catch up later
  • C: The body of research is thin in the first place, and strong conclusions cannot be drawn
The strength of research evidence on Steiner education, by area
The body of research that can be confirmed at present, organized by area by the editorial team (★3 is the richest)
Motivation to learn
Several positive findings
★★
Artistic expression
Positive findings; quantification is limited
★★
Social-emotional
Positive in PISA and elsewhere
★★
Academics in lower grades
Somewhat modest compared with public schools
★★
Academics in upper grades
Tendency to catch up later
★
Testing by RCT
Thin body of research
★

The number of stars shows the amount and consistency of research, and the color shows the direction of findings (green = positive, yellow = mixed, red = negative or insufficient). Many of the positive findings are concentrated in areas that are hard to quantify.

Source: Organized by the editorial team from Larrison et al. (2012), Oberle et al. (2021), Marshall (2017), and others

Taking both into account, it can be summarized like this: “The values that parents who choose Steiner education care about (rhythm, the arts, nature, a slow view of development, an environment that limits screens) have many aspects consistent with recent research on development and children’s well-being,” but “an effect such as test scores going up from attending a Steiner school” is not clearly supported by research.

Mom of a 4-year-old girl

When I visited the Steiner kindergarten nearby, it was really lovely. The cloth dolls, the beautiful chalkboard drawings… But the monthly fee is about twice that of an ordinary kindergarten, and I heard that its effects haven’t been proven by research, so I’m torn.

Nei-sensei

That’s a hard decision, isn’t it? To be honest, the body of research on Steiner education is still thin even compared with Montessori. An effect like “attending here will raise test scores” is not clearly supported by research.

Mom of a 4-year-old girl

So there’s no point in sending her…?

Nei-sensei

It’s not that simple either. Positive findings have been reported not for “test scores,” but for aspects such as “motivation to learn,” “artistic expression,” “engagement with nature,” and “a slow rhythm.” It depends on your family’s values—what you want to cherish.

Mom of a 4-year-old girl

The background philosophy called anthroposophy seems a little religious, and it bothers me…

Nei-sensei

Honestly, parents take that differently. Many Steiner kindergartens in Japan don’t require parents to believe in anthroposophy. But the teachers learn anthroposophy in internal training, and it is the basis for practices like “until age 7, develop the body and senses rather than giving intellectual stimulation.” Before deciding to enroll, asking directly during a visit, “How much involvement with anthroposophy do you expect from parents?” is, I think, the most reassuring way.

Mom of a 4-year-old girl

I see—it’s OK to ask.

Nei-sensei

Kindergartens are used to questions like that. In fact, it matters to the kindergarten too that parents send their children there with understanding.

Children this method tends to suit, and children it may not

From research and accumulated practice, these tendencies are said to exist. However, they are not absolute; please read them only as a guide.

Children it often suits

  • Children who like to play at length with their imagination — children who can make up their own stories and play in an environment with few ready-made toys
  • Children who like activities using their hands — drawing, knitting, kneading, and similar activities are at the center of daily life
  • Children who find a slow pace comfortable — children who prefer the security of repetition rather than a packed schedule
  • Children interested in nature and the changing seasons — walks, outdoor play, and seasonal festivals take up much of the time

Children who may need some consideration

  • Children with a strong desire to read letters or learn numbers early — Steiner’s policy is not to start reading and writing instruction in earnest until around age 7. Families may need to respond flexibly
  • Children who love character goods — Anpanman, Pretty Cure, Pokémon, and the like do not appear at the kindergarten. You need to think about how to reach a compromise at home
  • Energetic children who love to play boisterously in groups — the basic tone of a Steiner kindergarten is quiet, and some children feel it is a little lacking at first
  • Children who love digital devices — because the policy of limiting screens is a premise of the kindergarten, some adjustment is expected at home too

However, these do not mean “it doesn’t suit them,” but that “the closer the family’s values are to the kindergarten’s values, the more comfortably both the child and the parents can spend their time.” Steiner kindergartens are kindergartens that go quite deeply into “how the family lives,” so we recommend checking that compatibility carefully in advance.

Closing dialogue

Mom of a 4-year-old girl

In the end, how should I think about whether to send my child to a Steiner kindergarten?

Nei-sensei

First, I recommend going to visit. The best thing is to see how your child reacts to the atmosphere of the classroom and whether she shows interest in the activities. At the same time, if you talk at home about “whether we can greatly reduce TV,” “whether we can keep character goods away to some extent,” and “whether we are convinced about not rushing letters and numbers,” there will be less of a gap after she starts.

Mom of a 4-year-old girl

If we don’t send her, are there things we can do at home?

Nei-sensei

In fact, many of the elements Steiner values are easy to bring in precisely at home. For example, “a rhythmic life” of doing the same thing at the same time every day (morning snack, evening bath, picture book before bed), small seasonal decorations (cherry branches in spring, pinecones in autumn), time spent in nature, simple toys like silk cloths and wooden blocks, a story before bed, and gentle screen limits. These alone become a foundation for a Steiner-like home.

Mom of a 4-year-old girl

So even without sending her to a Steiner kindergarten, there are things we can do at home. I feel a little relieved.

Nei-sensei

That’s right. And these are not so much “good because they’re Steiner” as elements whose importance has been pointed out repeatedly in recent research on screens and on children’s well-being. You can decide whether to send her to a Steiner kindergarten based on your family’s values and your child’s fit.

Research details

Primary sources
MixedOberle, Ji, Magee, Guhn, Schonert-Reichl, & Gadermann2021Large-scale Assessments in Education, 9, 13

Study design: Secondary analysis of data from a large international achievement survey (PISA 2015), using propensity score matching

Participants: The Austrian PISA 2015 sample of 7,007 15-year-olds, including 149 Waldorf students. After matching, 149 Waldorf students vs. a comparison group of 1,107 were analyzed

Main results: Compared with the comparison group with matched family backgrounds, Waldorf students were significantly higher in enjoyment of learning science and interest in science (p<0.01). On the other hand, science test scores were slightly lower or about the same. Mediation analysis showed that the differences in attitude could be mostly explained by high exposure to “inquiry-based science education (IBSE),” but the lower test scores could not be explained by IBSE.

Limitations: Because it is an observational study, the influence of unmeasured factors (parents’ views of education, school culture, etc.) cannot be completely ruled out. The results are from the specific context of Austria.

MixedLarrison, Daly, & VanVooren2012Current Issues in Education, 15(3)

Study design: Comparative analysis of standardized achievement tests using publicly available data, and quantitative content analysis of parent comments

Participants: Public Waldorf charter schools in the United States (20 years of data), and local public schools and matched comparison schools

Main results: In the lower grades (2nd to 3rd grade), scores were significantly lower than the public school average in both reading and math. On the other hand, in 6th to 8th grade, they were significantly above the public school average, especially in reading. This suggests a pattern of “developing slowly and catching up later.” In the analysis of parent comments, aspects such as the arts, community, and education suited to developmental stages were highly valued.

Limitations: It is a comparison of public data, and family backgrounds and abilities at entry are not fully matched. The influence of self-selection bias (parents’ conscious choice) cannot be ruled out.

MixedBarrera & Hoffer2024Frontiers in Education, 9, 1323535

Study design: A three-group comparison using California’s standardized achievement test (CAASPP)

Participants: 16 Waldorf-type charter schools in California, other charter schools, and local public schools

Main results: In achievement in English and math, Waldorf charters were lower than other charters in some areas, but compared with local public schools with matched socioeconomic backgrounds, they were equal to or higher in several areas. As a secondary finding, it also reported that Waldorf charters have relatively high proportions of English language learners and children from economically disadvantaged families.

Limitations: It is a cross-sectional study, not follow-up data. The substance of “Waldorf-type charters” (teacher training, fidelity to Waldorf) differs among schools.

MixedMarshall, C.2017npj Science of Learning, 2, 11

Study design: A systematic review of Montessori education (also touching on the state of research on alternative education methods in general)

Scope: An integrated review of the major existing Montessori studies

Main results (the parts relevant to this article): Evaluations of the effects of alternative education methods (Montessori, Waldorf, etc.) have almost no rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Many are observational or matching studies, with problems of selection bias, sample size, and implementation fidelity. Speaking rigorously about the effects of alternative education methods requires more methodologically robust research.

Limitations: Its main subject is Montessori. It is not a comprehensive review of Waldorf research.